Go language?? why not focus on Javascript like Node platform..? Look what springsource-vmware is doing with it's cloud foundry... Watch for the pricing model, looks like a fail from Google.
would be nice if GAE can be a open source PaaS platform like cloud foundry. ATM, i am seriously considering migrate all my work to cloud foundry Maybe you guys can work more with AppScale? anyway,i would like to see i can host GAE apps in my private cloud
+1 to Damian. There are a couple languages that'd be interested and are missing in a cloud environment, but Go is by far the last of them. How about JS, Ruby, Erlang? Argh.
The new pricing model and free quota reduction will prevent me from using GAE for small projects. It's now a lot cheaper use PHP frameworks that can be hosted in almost any hosting provider.
Am I missing something URLFETCH still seems to have a 1 MB limit - see error below trying to post a 6MB call?
om.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$RequestTooLargeException: The request to API call urlfetch.Fetch() was too large. at com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl$AsyncApiFuture.rpcFinished(ApiProxyImpl.java:418)
Very upset about the limitations to the mailing API. Would be nice if there was some way to send on behalf of non-gmail users, even if it's rate limited or something.
And how exactly does reducing the number of free recipients per day from 2000 to 100 improve the mail service? My cost expectations were just increased by this. This is not a good thing, and I fail to see any justification for it.
Great news! I love the new pricing chart. VERY simple.
How does one set an app so that it is disabled if it reaches the limit of the free service? I'd hate to wake up one day and have my free app end up with a bill to pay.
Follow
Go language?? why not focus on Javascript like Node platform..?
ReplyDeleteLook what springsource-vmware is doing with it's cloud foundry...
Watch for the pricing model, looks like a fail from Google.
Cool!
ReplyDeleteDoes this mean that for a backend process the max URLFetch timeout went up to infty too? (YAY for continous open connections?)
would be nice if GAE can be a open source PaaS platform like cloud foundry. ATM, i am seriously considering migrate all my work to cloud foundry
ReplyDeleteMaybe you guys can work more with AppScale? anyway,i would like to see i can host GAE apps in my private cloud
+1 to Damian. There are a couple languages that'd be interested and are missing in a cloud environment, but Go is by far the last of them. How about JS, Ruby, Erlang? Argh.
ReplyDeleteThe new pricing model and free quota reduction will prevent me from using GAE for small projects. It's now a lot cheaper use PHP frameworks that can be hosted in almost any hosting provider.
ReplyDeleteAgreed with Damian and Jakub: why Go when Google could reuse V8 so obviously.
ReplyDeletewhy not traceur (javascript/next) or native Scala Api's without Java Wrappers or Python 3 ? I just don't get Go ! Please Google Team, explain us !???
ReplyDeleteYou'd better get more clarity around the new pricing long before it goes into effect.
ReplyDeleteWe have a moderate-traffic site that nevertheless has 6 instances hanging around sometimes. I bet we could do with 1, and that's a huge difference.
Will the old datastore be removed at some point? Are we forced to migrate?
ReplyDeleteAm I missing something URLFETCH still seems to have a 1 MB limit - see error below trying to post a 6MB call?
ReplyDeleteom.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$RequestTooLargeException: The request to API call urlfetch.Fetch() was too large.
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl$AsyncApiFuture.rpcFinished(ApiProxyImpl.java:418)
Give a man a GO compiler and he eats for a day.
ReplyDeleteGive a man a C compiler and he feeds upon php/python/jscript/lua/etc for the rest of his life.
Want to ask you about quotas of BackEnd
ReplyDeleteAre there free quotas for BackEnd?
I'm confused
Great news! Improvement on the datastore would have been nice. Like the ability to do inequality comparisons on more than one field.
ReplyDeleteThe datastore seems to me the most limited feature of the App Engine.
How about Ruby and PHP?
ReplyDeleteThe Backends Java API link in the Google App Engine site is broken. 404. that's an error.
ReplyDeleteVery upset about the limitations to the mailing API. Would be nice if there was some way to send on behalf of non-gmail users, even if it's rate limited or something.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAnd how exactly does reducing the number of free recipients per day from 2000 to 100 improve the mail service? My cost expectations were just increased by this. This is not a good thing, and I fail to see any justification for it.
ReplyDeleteGreat news! I love the new pricing chart. VERY simple.
ReplyDeleteHow does one set an app so that it is disabled if it reaches the limit of the free service? I'd hate to wake up one day and have my free app end up with a bill to pay.